Is your innovation portfolio building serious value—or just draining resources? In this episode of Next Moves with AI, hosts Greg Galle and Daniel Buritica dive into one of the biggest blind spots in organizational innovation: the lack of portfolio thinking. Too many leaders are juggling disconnected initiatives without a clear view of alignment, risk balance, or capital impact. Greg and Daniel introduce the Next Portfolio Manager AI Assistant—a GPT-powered strategic coach designed to help you manage innovation intelligently. This isn’t about tracking tasks—it’s about thinking differently, balancing ambition with structure, and unlocking multidimensional value. Through real-world stories from NASA, Melbourne, and Siemens, you’ll discover how disciplined portfolio management transforms innovation from chaos into a serious capital engine. What You’ll Learn in This Episode: Why most organizations can’t answer how many innovation initiatives they’re actually running. How the U.S. Army’s $18B Future Combat Systems failure highlights the danger of unmanaged innovation. How NASA balanced moonshots and steady wins to deliver lasting impact—and how you can apply the same approach. How Melbourne and Siemens used portfolio thinking to unlock hidden value across social, natural, intellectual, and reputational capital. The five key prompts to test drive the Next Portfolio Manager AI Assistant and start rethinking your innovation strategy today.
Greg Galle
What if I told you most organizations aren’t actually managing their innovation efforts—they’re with them?
Daniel Buritica
And not small bets—we’re talking about gambling with your resources, your people’s energy, your reputation, and serious capital.
Greg Galle
Welcome to . I’m Greg Galle.
Daniel Buritica
And I’m Daniel Buritica. Today, we’re revealing why even the smartest organizations fall into this trap—and how you can avoid it by managing designed to build the right kind of capital.
Greg Galle
By the end of this episode, you’ll know how to use the to bring structure, clarity, and discipline to your innovation efforts—by balancing across .
Daniel Buritica
Let’s be honest—how many times have you heard a leader say, Like that’s automatically a good thing?
Greg Galle
Yeah, but when we ask, —the room gets quiet.
Daniel Buritica
Here’s the thing: Busyness isn’t progress. When teams are pulling in different directions, chasing shiny ideas, and overloading resources—that’s not innovation. That’s .
Greg Galle
And it leads to what we call . People get excited at first, but when projects stall or feel disconnected from real impact, morale drops, trust erodes, and suddenly innovation feels like an empty promise.
Daniel Buritica
If you don’t have a clear view—a real —you’re not leading innovation. You’re hoping something sticks. And hope, as the saying goes, isn’t a strategy.
Daniel Buritica
Okay. So, let’s bring this to life with one of the biggest innovation misfires in recent history—the U.S. Army’s .
Daniel Buritica
This was a bold vision. A fully integrated battlefield system—drones, autonomous vehicles, next-gen communications. But by 2009, after spending , the program was scrapped.
Greg Galle
What went wrong?
Greg Galle
They didn’t manage it as a set of portfolios. Everything was treated as equally urgent, equally feasible.
Greg Galle
No segmentation.
Greg Galle
No phasing.
Greg Galle
Imagine loading your pipeline with nothing but high-risk moonshots—and pushing them all at once.
Daniel Buritica
No structured reviews.
Daniel Buritica
No clear alignment with evolving military needs.
Daniel Buritica
And no way to pivot when cracks appeared.
Greg Galle
So. Let’s take a moment to pause and reflect.
Greg Galle
:
Greg Galle
Where in your organization are you treating every idea as equally urgent?
Greg Galle
Where are you skipping segmentation or ignoring risk balance?
Daniel Buritica
The lesson here is simple—
Daniel Buritica
Future Combat Systems didn’t fail because of a bad idea. It failed because nobody managed the portfolio of opportunities.
Daniel Buritica
Here’s where most leaders get tripped up. It’s not just that they don’t know how many initiatives they’re running—it’s that they’re not thinking in terms of .
Greg Galle
Exactly. At Solve Next, we recommend organizations sort innovation opportunities into , each designed to achieve specific capital-building priorities:
Greg Galle
performance-improving innovations—making what you already do better.
Greg Galle
of market-expanding innovations—capturing new opportunities.
Greg Galle
of disruptive innovations—your bold bets that reinvent the ways things are done.
Greg Galle
And a of opportunities to by exiting activities that no longer deliver sufficient impact.
Daniel Buritica
Just like you wouldn’t manage stocks, bonds, and cash the same way—you shouldn’t lump every innovation effort into one bucket. Each portfolio carries different risks, timelines, and returns across human, intellectual, political, reputational, social, and financial capital.
Daniel Buritica
So if you’re treating everything as “one portfolio,” you’re likely falling short or overshooting your capital-building goals.
Daniel Buritica
This is exactly why the exists. It’s not just tracking projects—it’s helping you
Greg Galle
It helps you see if you are overloaded in without enough to stabilize.
Greg Galle
You are neglecting —letting low-impact efforts drain capital.
Greg Galle
If your is aligned with where you want to expand market presence.
Daniel Buritica
It gives you that perspective—so you’re balancing ambition, performance, and resource liberation intelligently.
Daniel Buritica
Let’s take a look at Next Portfolio Management done right. NASA doesn’t manage one giant innovation portfolio—they balance across , each designed to achieve specific outcomes and manage risk intelligently.
Daniel Buritica
Their focuses on performance improvements—like extending the lifespan of satellites or upgrading systems on the International Space Station. These are low-risk, steady-return initiatives that ensured operational excellence and continuous value delivery.
Daniel Buritica
Their centers around programs like the —taking proven technologies and expanding their scientific reach. These initiatives aren’t moonshots—they’re scalable, with clear paths to impact, keeping public engagement high and political stakeholders supportive.
Daniel Buritica
Their is home to bold, transformative bets like the . High risk, high reward. But crucially, NASA never allows these disruptive projects to dominate their overall innovation landscape.
Daniel Buritica
And when necessary, they apply —like when they retired the aging . That wasn’t just about shutting down a legacy system—it was a strategic move to and redirect it toward next-gen initiatives.
Greg Galle
So. Here’s where the practical insight comes in for leaders:
Greg Galle
NASA didn’t just "balance" for the sake of it—they designed a where:
Greg Galle
kept the lights on and maintained trust.
Greg Galle
provided momentum and visible wins.
Greg Galle
pushed boundaries—but within a controlled portion of their total effort.
Greg Galle
And ensured they weren’t clinging to outdated programs out of sentiment or inertia.
Greg Galle
When delays hit the James Webb Telescope, NASA didn’t face a crisis—because their were still delivering crucial forms of capital.
Greg Galle
That’s what looks like.
Daniel Buritica
If you’re leading innovation, ask yourself:
Daniel Buritica
Daniel Buritica
Daniel Buritica
Daniel Buritica
Daniel Buritica
This is exactly where the can guide you—by making sure your ambition is structured, balanced, and sustainable.
Daniel Buritica
Now, let’s look beyond aerospace. Cities and corporations are applying the same principles—whether they realize it or not.
Daniel Buritica
Take .
Daniel Buritica
They didn’t just decide, They treated green spaces as part of a —expanding community well-being, reducing urban heat, improving air quality.
Daniel Buritica
But they didn’t stop there.
Daniel Buritica
They also identified —like repurposing outdated industrial zones or inefficient roadways into green corridors.
Daniel Buritica
This wasn’t just beautification—it was . They freed up underperforming urban assets and turned them into long-term value generators across , , and .
Greg Galle
And they measured success beyond budget and timelines.
Greg Galle
They tracked:
Greg Galle
Reductions in public health costs due to better air quality.
Greg Galle
Increases in social cohesion and citizen satisfaction.
Greg Galle
And environmental resilience metrics like biodiversity and flood prevention.
Greg Galle
That’s what happens when you manage initiatives as , not standalone projects.
Daniel Buritica
Now, let’s cut to the corporate world and .
Daniel Buritica
They faced the challenge of digital transformation across multiple sectors. Instead of lumping everything under a vague "innovation program," they structured :
Daniel Buritica
Their focused on upgrading existing manufacturing lines with IoT sensors—improving efficiency and reducing operational costs.
Daniel Buritica
Their helped them expand into smart energy solutions, where market demand was accelerating and reputational capital was growing.
Daniel Buritica
Their invests in AI-driven healthcare diagnostics—a bold move into new territory with disruptive potential.
Daniel Buritica
And critically, they maintain a constant focus on —identifying legacy systems, outdated services, and internal processes that could be retired to .
Greg Galle
Here’s the actionable insight:
Greg Galle
Siemens leaders weren’t just asking,
Greg Galle
They were continuously asking:
Greg Galle
Greg Galle
Greg Galle
Daniel Buritica
This is what the helps leaders visualize—how to allocate resources across these portfolios, track capital impact, and stay agile as conditions change.
Greg Galle
Here’s the core takeaway—.
Greg Galle
It’s a system of , each playing a role in building—growing, protecting, and liberating capital.
Greg Galle
If you’re treating all initiatives the same—applying the same decision criteria, the same pace, or the same expectations—you’re setting yourself up for imbalance and disappointment.
Daniel Buritica
Without segmentation, leaders unknowingly:
Daniel Buritica
Over-invest in high-risk Renew initiatives without the stabilizing force of Optimize.
Daniel Buritica
Miss out on Grow opportunities because they’re distracted by disruptive ideas.
Daniel Buritica
Let underperforming projects linger, draining resources that should be .
Greg Galle
Managing allows you to:
Greg Galle
Balance short-term performance with long-term vision.
Greg Galle
Make smarter trade-offs when resources tighten.
Greg Galle
And communicate clearly with constituents about where capital is being created—and why some initiatives look different than others.
Daniel Buritica
And that’s exactly what separates organizations that from those that burn out after a few flashy projects.
Daniel Buritica
Here’s how you start bringing order to your innovation chaos—by asking these five questions .
Daniel Buritica
Think of this as your —with or without AI—but trust me, it’s a lot easier with the right thinking partner.
Daniel Buritica
First:
Daniel Buritica
Too often, leaders treat everything like a single to-do list. Sorting initiatives is the first step toward clarity—and resilience.
Daniel Buritica
Second:
Daniel Buritica
An Optimize opportunity should improve performance. A Grow initiative should expand market or impact. If they’re not doing that—you’ve got misalignment.
Daniel Buritica
Third:
Daniel Buritica
What are you holding onto that no longer delivers value? Freeing up capital is just as strategic as launching something new.
Daniel Buritica
Fourth:
Daniel Buritica
Bold bets are exciting—but without a foundation, they can sink you.
Daniel Buritica
Finally:
Daniel Buritica
If you’re applying the same cadence to every opportunity, you’re either rushing or stagnating parts of your portfolio.
Greg Galle
This is where smart leadership shows up—not in chasing the next big idea, but in .
Greg Galle
These five questions force you to think holistically—about risk, alignment, and capital impact.
Greg Galle
And this is exactly where the becomes invaluable. It doesn’t just remind you to ask these questions—it helps you answer them, consistently and objectively.
Daniel Buritica
So here’s your next move—don’t just listen and nod along. Go to the show notes and start your of the AI Assistant. See how quickly you can move from guessing to knowing—how structured clarity can transform your innovation outcomes.
Greg Galle
And we want to hear from you.
Greg Galle
What did these five questions surface in your organization?
Greg Galle
Where did you uncover hidden risks—or untapped opportunities?
Greg Galle
Connect with us on LinkedIn, share your insights, or drop us a message with your biggest innovation challenge—we just might feature it in a future episode.
Daniel Buritica
And, of course, don’t forget to to so you never miss an episode on how to lead smarter, more sustainable innovation.
Greg Galle
Thanks for joining us—see you next time on .
Chapters (8)
About the podcast
Next Moves with AI is a special series from Make Next Happen exploring how AI helps leaders drive smarter, faster innovation. Hosted by Greg Galle and Daniel Buritica of Solve Next, each episode introduces an AI Assistant from their Intelligent Innovation System—tools that tackle real-world challenges and offer practical ways to act today. If you’re ready to move beyond ad-hoc innovation, this series is your next move.
This podcast is brought to you by Jellypod, Inc.
© 2025 All rights reserved.